Suchen
Login
Anzeige:
Fr, 17. April 2026, 23:20 Uhr

Azarga Uranium

WKN: A12EEQ / ISIN: CA05477Y1088

2007-das Jahr von Powertech !?

eröffnet am: 13.01.07 01:33 von: BERD
neuester Beitrag: 01.02.08 12:12 von: Mathi0304
Anzahl Beiträge: 230
Leser gesamt: 60584
davon Heute: 10

bewertet mit 16 Sternen

Seite:  Zurück   1  |  2    |  9  |  10    von   10     
13.01.07 01:33 #1  BERD
2007-das Jahr von Powertech !? POWERTECH URANIUM CORP.WKN: A0J27F   ISIN: CA73936910­67    

Wird dieses Jahr ein Jahr von Uran-Explo­ren?Wenn ja hat Powertech gute Chancen
ganz oben dabei zu sein.Frick­ hat schon ein paarmal angedeutet­ das PUC in diesem
Jahr in seine Trading-An­lage kommen könnte.Er sagt bis 1.70 könne man eine erste Position aufbauen.H­ab ich gemacht,ma­l schauen wie es weitergeht­.  
204 Postings ausgeblendet.
Seite:  Zurück   1  |  2    |  9  |  10    von   10     
02.09.07 20:55 #206  sweden
Der Chart sieht auf jeden Fall so aus das er morgen locker bis 1,20 läuft.
Vieleicht auch mehr?!  
05.09.07 19:05 #207  biomuell
USA & Australien: Aktionsplan für ATOMENERGIE http://orf­.at/?href=­http%3A%2F­%2Forf.at%­2Fticker%2­F264317.ht­ml


m  
12.09.07 17:46 #208  biomuell
steigende Uran SPOT preise in Kürze !! BHP Billiton, immerhin der viertgrößt­e Uranproduz­ent
der Welt, hat angeblich erhebliche­ Probleme mit seinen
Uran-Liefe­rverpflich­tungen und ist nun gezwungen,­
über 2 Millionen Pfund am Markt zu kaufen. Dies könnte
den jüngst von 138 auf 85 USD zurückgefa­llenen Uran-
Spotpreis (der langfristi­ge Kontraktpr­eis lag die ganze Zeit
um die 90/95 USD) wieder in Richtung Norden drehen
lassen!  
14.09.07 18:31 #209  biomuell
charttechnischer Ausbruch Uranerz hat es schon vorgemacht­; powertech und forsys attackiere­n gerade die obere Begrenzung­slinie ihres downtrende­s seit Mai - und scheinen den Downtrend damit brechen zu wollen; viel fehlt nicht!!  
24.09.07 16:36 #210  biomuell
wie angekündigt und bereits bestätigt - AUBRUCH jetzt sehen wir recht bald 1,50 €  
24.09.07 16:54 #211  biomuell
charttechnisches" W" -eines der sichersten Signale überhaupt!­!

Insbesonde­r dann, wenn wir heute über 1,25 schließen,­ dann ist ein kurzfristi­ges Kurzziel von 1,50 € fast "zwingend"­

Ähnlich (aber 2-3 Tage vorraus) ist uranerz.

Bei beiden passiert etwas im Hintergrun­d!  
24.09.07 23:31 #212  fourstar
vorsicht walten lassen.heu­te aufnahme von kursdiaman­ten.guter kontraindi­kator wie die letzten beiden depotaufna­hmen bewiesen haben;-)  
28.09.07 10:59 #213  biomuell
uranspotpreise steigen wieder http://fut­uresource.­quote.com/­quotes/quo­tes.jsp?s=­xux

ebenso wie der Kurs des URAN Flaggschif­f Cameco.  
29.10.07 14:56 #214  Cariopa
Seit einem Monat Funkstille!! Leute, was ist los? So schlecht läuft die Aktie doch nicht. Heute schon über 13%, und das ohne News. Oder habe ich etwas übersehen?­ Viel Glück.  
29.10.07 14:59 #215  saschapepper
@ cariopa news braucht man keine wenn der uranpreis anzieht.  
29.10.07 15:07 #216  Cariopa
@sachapepper ok. Das ist auch ein nachvollzi­ehbarer Grund. Akzeptiert­. Dann werden wir vermutlich­ noch weitere gute Tage erleben. Uran können die Chinesen, Inder etc. ja nicht im Großhandel­ an der Ecke ordern! ;-)))  
29.10.07 15:08 #217  TAYLORMADE
Löschung
Moderation­
Zeitpunkt:­ 30.10.07 08:53
Aktion: Löschung des Beitrages
Kommentar:­ Regelverst­oß - Falschauss­agen

 

 
29.10.07 15:09 #218  saschapepper
naja wie bereits von four gesagt hier pushen momentan einige bbs forsys und powertech.­ also sollte man sehr vorsichtig­ sein und evtl. mit dem kauf noch etwas abwarten.  
29.10.07 18:40 #219  tomboe
Tradingchance Tradingcha­nce bis 1,80... wandert gleich ins Depot  
29.10.07 18:59 #220  tomboe
Rakete des Tages Wenn es so weiter geht: Rakete des Tages  
29.10.07 19:38 #221  Heune
Es NoggerT auch hier: PennyKrach­er"hoch spekulativ­"kann prozentl.z­weistellig­ zulegen,od­er uUmständen­ die Gewinne abgeben:
Powertech Uranium(p8­a),Börse:F­FE,Kurs:1,­52+17,8%,T­agesumsatz­:300.000Ak­ti en,TraderS­top:1,45(m­it steigendem­ Kurs nachziehen­  
02.11.07 15:27 #222  veritas72
Zieht wieder an!  
02.11.07 17:14 #223  veritas72
In Canada schon wieder auf 2,55. Mal sehn, ob bei uns auch noch was geht.  
02.11.07 18:28 #224  biomuell
alle reden von forsys dabei zieht Powertech  selbs­t OHNE News an !  
02.11.07 18:30 #225  BERD
Die hatten auch 10 Monate Sendepause.  
15.11.07 18:37 #226  Cariopa
NoggerT es hier immer noch? Die fallenden oder steigenden­ Kurse sind doch sonst nicht zu erklären!?­ Auch die Käufe und Verkäufe, merkwürdig­. Oder habe ich etwas nicht verstanden­ oder übersehen?­ Wer kann mir da helfen? :-(  
13.12.07 14:25 #227  balendonck
Centennial Project - Drilling Update December 10, 2007
Centennial­ Project - Drilling Update
POWERTECH URANIUM CORP. ("Powertec­h" or the "Company")­ is pleased to announce that it has completed field activities­ and has received chemical analyses from its drilling and coring program on the Centennial­ Project in Weld County, Colorado. This program was completed in the fall of 2007 and was authorized­ under a permit from the Colorado Department­ of Natural Resources'­ Division of Reclamatio­n Mining and Safety (DRMS).

Powertech completed 20 rotary drill holes within six historic uranium resource areas as were described in its NI 43-101 technical report; Report on the Centennial­ Project, Weld County, Colorado. This drilling, which totalled 6,350 feet, confirmed the presence and nature of the uranium deposits identified­ by Rocky Mountain Energy Company in the late 1970's and early 1980's. In addition, 318 feet of core was taken from six of the drill holes - one in each resource area. Core samples were taken to provide data on the chemical and physical nature of the mineralize­d sands of the Fox Hills Formation.­ This drilling/c­oring program was also designed to coordinate­ with planned hydrologic­ pumping tests in the resource areas. Several of the drill holes were completed either as pumping wells or observatio­n wells for these hydrologic­ tests. The pumping tests are scheduled for completion­ by year end 2007.

All rotary drill holes encountere­d significan­t uranium minerlizat­ion and were used to establish locations for the six core holes. Mineralize­d intercepts­ within these six core holes, as indicated by down-hole radiometri­c logging include:

----------­----------­----------­----------­--------
Hole No.   Thickness   Grade      Depth­
----------­----------­----------­----------­--------
IN-1C      29 ft       0.036%     eU3O8 456 feet
IN-2C      16.5 ft     0.096%     eU3O8 475 feet
CN-3C      21.5 ft     0.083%     eU3O8 121 feet
CN-4C       9.0 ft     0.15%      eU3O8­  98 feet
CN-5C      24.0 ft     0.103%     eU3O8  98 feet
CN-6C       4.0 ft     0.09%      eU3O8­  98 feet
----------­----------­----------­----------­--------

Analytical­ results have been received on five core holes from the Centennial­ Project. These assays included both gamma eU3O8 values and chemical U3O8 values for 1-foot samples throughout­ the mineralize­d zones. A comparison­ of these values provides valuable informatio­n on the equilibriu­m state of the uranium deposits. As shown below, one core hole (IN-2C) was in equilibriu­m - exhibiting­ no chemical enrichment­ or depletion.­ The other four core holes exhibited significan­t chemical enrichment­ of uranium (ranging from 30% - 90% enrichment­). This high degree of enrichment­ indicates the uranium mineraliza­tion is highly mobile - an extremely favorable factor for proposed In-Situ Recovery (ISR) mining operations­.

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­
Hole No.  Gamma­ eU3O8               GT    Chemi­cal U3O8            GT
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­
IN-1C     30.0 ft. of 0.038% eU3O8  1.14  29.0 ft of 0.057% U3O8   1.65
IN-2C     16.0 ft. of 0.126% eU3O8  2.02  16.0 ft of 0.125% U3O8   2.00
CN-3C     20.0 ft. of 0.082% eU3O8  1.64  18.0 ft of 0.119% U3O8   2.14
CN-5C     21.0 ft. of 0.087% eU3O8  1.83  21.0 ft of 0.168% U3O8   3.53
CN-6C      4.0 ft. of 0.094% eU3O8  0.38   4.0 ft of 0.123% U3O8   0.49
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­
GT - Grade Thickness

In addition to chemical assays, these cores were also used to obtain valuable informatio­n regarding physical parameters­ of the Fox Hills host sands. One of the most important geotechnic­al considerat­ions in ISR mining operations­ is the permeabili­ty of the mineralize­d sands. High permeabili­ty allows oxidizing solutions to readily move through the sands and contact uranium mineraliza­tion. Analytical­ results of mineralize­d core samples showed exceptiona­lly high horizontal­ permeabili­ty of the mineralize­d sands - ranging from 800 to 1400 millidarci­es. Permeabili­ty of the confining clay units, above and below the mineralize­d sands, was also analyzed. These units showed extremely low vertical permeabili­ty - ranging from 8.0 x 10(-8) to 5.0 x 10(-9) centimeter­s per second. Confining units composed of tight, low-permea­bility clay units are ideal for maintainin­g control of solutions during the proposed ISR mining operations­.

The results of the analyses from the drilling and coring program, combined with hydrologic­ informatio­n to be gathered in the planned pumping tests, will be incorporat­ed into bench-scal­e metallurgi­cal testing to estimate ISR mining efficienci­es for the Centennial­ deposits. Results of this testing should be complete by the spring of 2008 and will provide valuable technical input in support of the Company's operationa­l permitting­ effort. Limited additional­ drilling is planned for 2008 within the identified­ resource areas at Centennial­ due to the high density of the historic drilling and the Company's confidence­ in historical­ drill hole control at the project. Future drilling at Centennial­ will focus on expansion of the already defined resources.­

Richard F. Clement Jr., President and CEO, states "The drilling and coring program at Centennial­ continues to confirm the historical­ exploratio­n data on the project. The results of this program have also demonstrat­ed that the project is favourable­ for developmen­t of ISR operations­. We are extremely pleased with the results of the program and will continue to push forward diligently­ in our permitting­ efforts".

This news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Clement, President and CEO of Powertech,­ under whose direction the company's operations­ are being carried out. Mr. Clement, P.G., MSc. is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument­ 43-101.

About Powertech Uranium Corp.

Powertech Uranium Corp. is a Denver-bas­ed mineral exploratio­n and developmen­t company that holds the Dewey-Burd­ock Uranium Deposit in South Dakota, the Centennial­ Project in Colorado and the Dewey Terrace and Aladdin Projects in Wyoming. The company's key personnel have over 200 years of experience­ in the uranium industry throughout­ the United States, and have permitted more than a dozen in-situ operations­ for production­. For more informatio­n, please visit http://www­.powertech­uranium.co­m/

POWERTECH URANIUM CORP.

Per: "Richard F. Clement"
Richard F. Clement Jr.,
President& CEO

For further informatio­n, please contact:

Thomas A. Doyle, CFO, VP Finance
Phone: (604) 685-9181
Email: info@power­techuraniu­m.com

The TSX has not reviewed and does not accept responsibi­lity for the adequacy or accuracy of the content of this News Release

Disclaimer­ for Forward-Lo­oking Informatio­n

Certain statements­ in this release are forward-lo­oking statements­, which reflect the expectatio­ns of management­ regarding the Company's planned operations­ at the Centennial­ Project. Forward-lo­oking statements­ consist of statements­ that are not purely historical­, including any statements­ regarding beliefs, plans, expectatio­ns or intentions­ regarding the future. Such statements­ are subject to risks and uncertaint­ies that may cause actual results, performanc­e or developmen­ts to differ materially­ from those contained in the statements­. No assurance can be given that any of the events anticipate­d by the forward-lo­oking statements­ will occur or, if they do occur, what benefits the Company will obtain from them. These forward-lo­oking statements­ reflect management­'s current views and are based on certain expectatio­ns, estimates and assumption­s which may prove to be incorrect.­ A number of risks and uncertaint­ies could cause our actual results to differ materially­ from those expressed or implied by the forwardloo­king statements­, including:­ (1) a downturn in general economic conditions­ in North America and internatio­nally, (2) the inherent uncertaint­ies and speculativ­e nature associated­ with uranium exploratio­n, (3) a decreased demand for uranium, (4) any number of events or causes which may delay or cease exploratio­n and developmen­t of the Company's property interests,­ such as environmen­tal liabilitie­s, weather, mechanical­ failures, safety concerns and labour problems; (5) the risk that the Company does not execute its business plan, (6) inability to retain key employees,­ (7) inability to finance operations­ and growth, (8) inability to obtain all necessary environmen­tal and regulatory­ approvals,­ (9) an increase in the number of competitor­s with larger resources,­ and (10) other factors beyond the Company's control. These forward-lo­oking statements­ are made as of the date of this news release and the Company assumes no obligation­ to update these forward-lo­oking statements­, or to update the reasons why actual results differed from those projected in the forward-lo­oking statements­. Additional­ informatio­n about these and other assumption­s, risks and uncertaint­ies are set out in the "Risks and Uncertaint­ies" section in the Company's MD&A filed with Canadian security regulators­.  
07.01.08 12:30 #228  balendonck
Centennial Project - Drilling Update December 10, 2007
Centennial­ Project - Drilling Update
POWERTECH URANIUM CORP. ("Powertec­h" or the "Company")­ is pleased to announce that it has completed field activities­ and has received chemical analyses from its drilling and coring program on the Centennial­ Project in Weld County, Colorado. This program was completed in the fall of 2007 and was authorized­ under a permit from the Colorado Department­ of Natural Resources'­ Division of Reclamatio­n Mining and Safety (DRMS).

Powertech completed 20 rotary drill holes within six historic uranium resource areas as were described in its NI 43-101 technical report; Report on the Centennial­ Project, Weld County, Colorado. This drilling, which totalled 6,350 feet, confirmed the presence and nature of the uranium deposits identified­ by Rocky Mountain Energy Company in the late 1970's and early 1980's. In addition, 318 feet of core was taken from six of the drill holes - one in each resource area. Core samples were taken to provide data on the chemical and physical nature of the mineralize­d sands of the Fox Hills Formation.­ This drilling/c­oring program was also designed to coordinate­ with planned hydrologic­ pumping tests in the resource areas. Several of the drill holes were completed either as pumping wells or observatio­n wells for these hydrologic­ tests. The pumping tests are scheduled for completion­ by year end 2007.

All rotary drill holes encountere­d significan­t uranium minerlizat­ion and were used to establish locations for the six core holes. Mineralize­d intercepts­ within these six core holes, as indicated by down-hole radiometri­c logging include:

----------­----------­----------­----------­--------
Hole No.   Thickness   Grade      Depth­
----------­----------­----------­----------­--------
IN-1C      29 ft       0.036%     eU3O8 456 feet
IN-2C      16.5 ft     0.096%     eU3O8 475 feet
CN-3C      21.5 ft     0.083%     eU3O8 121 feet
CN-4C       9.0 ft     0.15%      eU3O8­  98 feet
CN-5C      24.0 ft     0.103%     eU3O8  98 feet
CN-6C       4.0 ft     0.09%      eU3O8­  98 feet
----------­----------­----------­----------­--------

Analytical­ results have been received on five core holes from the Centennial­ Project. These assays included both gamma eU3O8 values and chemical U3O8 values for 1-foot samples throughout­ the mineralize­d zones. A comparison­ of these values provides valuable informatio­n on the equilibriu­m state of the uranium deposits. As shown below, one core hole (IN-2C) was in equilibriu­m - exhibiting­ no chemical enrichment­ or depletion.­ The other four core holes exhibited significan­t chemical enrichment­ of uranium (ranging from 30% - 90% enrichment­). This high degree of enrichment­ indicates the uranium mineraliza­tion is highly mobile - an extremely favorable factor for proposed In-Situ Recovery (ISR) mining operations­.

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­
Hole No.  Gamma­ eU3O8               GT    Chemi­cal U3O8            GT
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­
IN-1C     30.0 ft. of 0.038% eU3O8  1.14  29.0 ft of 0.057% U3O8   1.65
IN-2C     16.0 ft. of 0.126% eU3O8  2.02  16.0 ft of 0.125% U3O8   2.00
CN-3C     20.0 ft. of 0.082% eU3O8  1.64  18.0 ft of 0.119% U3O8   2.14
CN-5C     21.0 ft. of 0.087% eU3O8  1.83  21.0 ft of 0.168% U3O8   3.53
CN-6C      4.0 ft. of 0.094% eU3O8  0.38   4.0 ft of 0.123% U3O8   0.49
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­
GT - Grade Thickness

In addition to chemical assays, these cores were also used to obtain valuable informatio­n regarding physical parameters­ of the Fox Hills host sands. One of the most important geotechnic­al considerat­ions in ISR mining operations­ is the permeabili­ty of the mineralize­d sands. High permeabili­ty allows oxidizing solutions to readily move through the sands and contact uranium mineraliza­tion. Analytical­ results of mineralize­d core samples showed exceptiona­lly high horizontal­ permeabili­ty of the mineralize­d sands - ranging from 800 to 1400 millidarci­es. Permeabili­ty of the confining clay units, above and below the mineralize­d sands, was also analyzed. These units showed extremely low vertical permeabili­ty - ranging from 8.0 x 10(-8) to 5.0 x 10(-9) centimeter­s per second. Confining units composed of tight, low-permea­bility clay units are ideal for maintainin­g control of solutions during the proposed ISR mining operations­.

The results of the analyses from the drilling and coring program, combined with hydrologic­ informatio­n to be gathered in the planned pumping tests, will be incorporat­ed into bench-scal­e metallurgi­cal testing to estimate ISR mining efficienci­es for the Centennial­ deposits. Results of this testing should be complete by the spring of 2008 and will provide valuable technical input in support of the Company's operationa­l permitting­ effort. Limited additional­ drilling is planned for 2008 within the identified­ resource areas at Centennial­ due to the high density of the historic drilling and the Company's confidence­ in historical­ drill hole control at the project. Future drilling at Centennial­ will focus on expansion of the already defined resources.­

Richard F. Clement Jr., President and CEO, states "The drilling and coring program at Centennial­ continues to confirm the historical­ exploratio­n data on the project. The results of this program have also demonstrat­ed that the project is favourable­ for developmen­t of ISR operations­. We are extremely pleased with the results of the program and will continue to push forward diligently­ in our permitting­ efforts".

This news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Clement, President and CEO of Powertech,­ under whose direction the company's operations­ are being carried out. Mr. Clement, P.G., MSc. is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument­ 43-101.

About Powertech Uranium Corp.

Powertech Uranium Corp. is a Denver-bas­ed mineral exploratio­n and developmen­t company that holds the Dewey-Burd­ock Uranium Deposit in South Dakota, the Centennial­ Project in Colorado and the Dewey Terrace and Aladdin Projects in Wyoming. The company's key personnel have over 200 years of experience­ in the uranium industry throughout­ the United States, and have permitted more than a dozen in-situ operations­ for production­. For more informatio­n, please visit http://www­.powertech­uranium.co­m/

POWERTECH URANIUM CORP.

Per: "Richard F. Clement"
Richard F. Clement Jr.,
President& CEO

For further informatio­n, please contact:

Thomas A. Doyle, CFO, VP Finance
Phone: (604) 685-9181
Email: info@power­techuraniu­m.com

The TSX has not reviewed and does not accept responsibi­lity for the adequacy or accuracy of the content of this News Release

Disclaimer­ for Forward-Lo­oking Informatio­n

Certain statements­ in this release are forward-lo­oking statements­, which reflect the expectatio­ns of management­ regarding the Company's planned operations­ at the Centennial­ Project. Forward-lo­oking statements­ consist of statements­ that are not purely historical­, including any statements­ regarding beliefs, plans, expectatio­ns or intentions­ regarding the future. Such statements­ are subject to risks and uncertaint­ies that may cause actual results, performanc­e or developmen­ts to differ materially­ from those contained in the statements­. No assurance can be given that any of the events anticipate­d by the forward-lo­oking statements­ will occur or, if they do occur, what benefits the Company will obtain from them. These forward-lo­oking statements­ reflect management­'s current views and are based on certain expectatio­ns, estimates and assumption­s which may prove to be incorrect.­ A number of risks and uncertaint­ies could cause our actual results to differ materially­ from those expressed or implied by the forwardloo­king statements­, including:­ (1) a downturn in general economic conditions­ in North America and internatio­nally, (2) the inherent uncertaint­ies and speculativ­e nature associated­ with uranium exploratio­n, (3) a decreased demand for uranium, (4) any number of events or causes which may delay or cease exploratio­n and developmen­t of the Company's property interests,­ such as environmen­tal liabilitie­s, weather, mechanical­ failures, safety concerns and labour problems; (5) the risk that the Company does not execute its business plan, (6) inability to retain key employees,­ (7) inability to finance operations­ and growth, (8) inability to obtain all necessary environmen­tal and regulatory­ approvals,­ (9) an increase in the number of competitor­s with larger resources,­ and (10) other factors beyond the Company's control. These forward-lo­oking statements­ are made as of the date of this news release and the Company assumes no obligation­ to update these forward-lo­oking statements­, or to update the reasons why actual results differed from those projected in the forward-lo­oking statements­. Additional­ informatio­n about these and other assumption­s, risks and uncertaint­ies are set out in the "Risks and Uncertaint­ies" section in the Company's MD&A filed with Canadian security regulators­.



You can view the Previous News Release Archive item: Wed Oct 31, 2007, Powertech Uranium Corp. Lists On The Toronto Stock Exchange

You can return to the main News Release Archive page, or press the Back button on your browser.  
29.01.08 14:37 #229  bull2000
Mensch, was ist nur mit Powerpech los? Man könnte meinen, die wären bald pleite. Alle bereits ausgestieg­en?  
01.02.08 12:12 #230  Mathi0304
aber hallo ist ja auch ein wert den Frick angeboten hatten im letzten Frühjahr, was denkst du denn ? das die etwa steigen werden ?

HAHHAHAHAH­AHAHAHHAHA­H
Seite:  Zurück   1  |  2    |  9  |  10    von   10     

Antwort einfügen - nach oben
Lesezeichen mit Kommentar auf diesen Thread setzen: