Fukushima, Gefahr für die Welt?
22.01.14 23:05
#1
Jule34
Fukushima, Gefahr für die Welt?
Radioaktivität hat die Pazifikküste erreicht.
http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_01_22/...alifornia-residents-2932/
http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_01_22/...alifornia-residents-2932/
29 Postings ausgeblendet.
23.01.14 15:36
#31
DarkKnight
Nur mal am Rande: es gibt keine Atom-Opfer ...
... was hier gerne vergessen wird (und wofür auch Claudia Roth beinahe verklagt wurde):
es gibt keine unmittelbaren Strahlen-Opfer ... nur Flut-opfer.
Und was die Amis angeht: z.Zt. laufen jede Menge Prozesse gegen Simulanten, die Entschädigungen nach 9/11 erhalten haben. Denen glaub ich kein Wort.
es gibt keine unmittelbaren Strahlen-Opfer ... nur Flut-opfer.
Und was die Amis angeht: z.Zt. laufen jede Menge Prozesse gegen Simulanten, die Entschädigungen nach 9/11 erhalten haben. Denen glaub ich kein Wort.
23.01.14 15:41
#33
HoloDoc
hat eignetlich mal jemand begriffen warum
in deutschland PRIVATE unternehmen die atomkraftwerke betreiben und uns dann diesen atomstrom verkaufen; die gewinne einsacken und später; wenn die brennstäbe ausgeglüht sind; dann kippen die uns das zeuchs vor die füsse und wir (der staat) soll das dann entsorgen und sich um die lagerung kümmern.
also für meinen privaten müll muss ich hier jeden monat fett bezahlen. eine ungerechtigkeit ist das! sauerrei! revolution!
also für meinen privaten müll muss ich hier jeden monat fett bezahlen. eine ungerechtigkeit ist das! sauerrei! revolution!
24.01.14 08:34
#39
Jule34
...
"There is really very little humanity can do, except pray this is not the
end of the world. And in the exceedingly fortuitous event that this is
NOT the end of humanity, everyone has the choice to demand a stop to
all the scientific madness that historically has so recklessly tempted
fate within this infinitely complex reality upon which every human being
relies for life and sustenance."
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.de/2014/01/...ith-nightmare-now.html
" The amount of radioactive poisons being poured into the Pacific Ocean, -DAILY-, is way beyond anything any scientist ever dreamed was possible.
But it is possible. And only a very long time will tell how devastating the effects of Fukushima will be. There is no waking from this nightmare. We all will live with Fukushima the rest of our lives."
end of the world. And in the exceedingly fortuitous event that this is
NOT the end of humanity, everyone has the choice to demand a stop to
all the scientific madness that historically has so recklessly tempted
fate within this infinitely complex reality upon which every human being
relies for life and sustenance."
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.de/2014/01/...ith-nightmare-now.html
" The amount of radioactive poisons being poured into the Pacific Ocean, -DAILY-, is way beyond anything any scientist ever dreamed was possible.
But it is possible. And only a very long time will tell how devastating the effects of Fukushima will be. There is no waking from this nightmare. We all will live with Fukushima the rest of our lives."
24.01.14 08:55
#40
K.Ramel
Technik versklavt
.... und wir kriegen die Kriese,
wenn mal 5 Minuten Stromausfall ist (weil irgendwo nen Lastwagen die Leitung kappte)
wenn die Kaffeemaschine nicht tut,
wenn die Waschmaschine keine Dienste mehr leisten will und Ersatz nicht kommt...
wenn die Glotze am Abend nicht funktionniert....
und die elektrischen Jalousien nicht zu öffnen siod
wenn die Küche kalt bleibt
und die Heizung nicht geht im Winter....
jaja...Technik versklavt....
Aber nen voll vernetzten Haushalt haben müssen
mit sprechendem Kühlschrank, der mir auf Abruf sagt, was ich kaufen muss
mit automatischer Beleuchtung des ganzen Anwesens, steuerbar von unterwegs
und nicht zu vergessen:
dem beheizbaren Küchenquirl für 1000 Eusos...
Wat mut, dat mut !
.... und wir kriegen die Kriese,
wenn mal 5 Minuten Stromausfall ist (weil irgendwo nen Lastwagen die Leitung kappte)
wenn die Kaffeemaschine nicht tut,
wenn die Waschmaschine keine Dienste mehr leisten will und Ersatz nicht kommt...
wenn die Glotze am Abend nicht funktionniert....
und die elektrischen Jalousien nicht zu öffnen siod
wenn die Küche kalt bleibt
und die Heizung nicht geht im Winter....
jaja...Technik versklavt....
Aber nen voll vernetzten Haushalt haben müssen
mit sprechendem Kühlschrank, der mir auf Abruf sagt, was ich kaufen muss
mit automatischer Beleuchtung des ganzen Anwesens, steuerbar von unterwegs
und nicht zu vergessen:
dem beheizbaren Küchenquirl für 1000 Eusos...
Wat mut, dat mut !
28.01.14 08:30
#42
Jule34
...
"The worlds most dangerous nun is being sentenced tomorrow: the infamous anti-nuke blood-thrower, Sister Megan Rice.
This hardcore 84-year-old could be considered the worlds most dangerous terrorist ever. Why? Because The New York Times reported that nuclear experts had called her action “the biggest security breach in the history of the nation’s atomic complex.”
http://climateviewer.com/2014/01/27/...-ass-nun-goes-prison-tomorrow/
This hardcore 84-year-old could be considered the worlds most dangerous terrorist ever. Why? Because The New York Times reported that nuclear experts had called her action “the biggest security breach in the history of the nation’s atomic complex.”
http://climateviewer.com/2014/01/27/...-ass-nun-goes-prison-tomorrow/
03.03.14 12:10
#44
cap blaubär
iss irgendwie schade datt tepco die suverenität
über die abläufe behält-da würd ich mir wünschen datt ne un-klitsche die fäden inne hand bekommt-deren priorität nicht die wirtschaftlichkeit iss-haben die eigentlich schonmal darüber nachgedacht das amiinteressen(versaute-meere etwa)vor us-gerichten ne recht teure angelegenheit werden können-tepco-marionetten hin oder her wenn da die bösen anwaltsgesellschaften sich da mal drumm kümmern isset am engg
03.03.14 12:29
#45
später_Wurm
Die eigentliche Gefahr ist
das sie nicht erkannt wird, bzw. von den Mächtigen zu erst erkannt wird, die dann nichts besseres zu tun haben als die Berichterstattung zu zensieren.
Allg. wird auch angenommen, daß man nun sowieso nichts mehr tun kann und geht fälschlicher weise davon aus, das jedes von einem GAU betroffene Land wirklich sein bestes tun wird um die Verseuchung einzudämmen, gar zu stoppen.
Diese Annahme ist leider falsch. Denn eine Indurstrie lebt, weil sie von einer Gewinnmaximierung innerhalb eines Zeitraums ausgeht - Ob eine Umweltverschmutzung durch Smog oder Radioaktivität ist den Investoren so was von S... egal - das können die sich nicht mal selbst vorstellen wie egal das ist.
Ich bleibe dabei: Atomenergie ist nur sauber, wenn man nicht darüber spricht.
einen Geigerzähler sollte man sich schon zulegen, bzw. sich so ein Gerät mit Nachbarn od. Freunden teilen - ab und an sollte man doch mal die Möglichkeit haben etwas nach zu prüfen. Denn wir dürfen uns nicht mehr auf Zoll und Umweltamt verlassen - die in anderen Ländern praktisch nicht existent sind.
Wir erhalten so viel Ware aus Fernost - für mich nur eine Zeitfrage bis es ausschlägt.
Die Asen mit dem Zeugs rum - geht auf keine Kuhhaut mehr.
Allg. wird auch angenommen, daß man nun sowieso nichts mehr tun kann und geht fälschlicher weise davon aus, das jedes von einem GAU betroffene Land wirklich sein bestes tun wird um die Verseuchung einzudämmen, gar zu stoppen.
Diese Annahme ist leider falsch. Denn eine Indurstrie lebt, weil sie von einer Gewinnmaximierung innerhalb eines Zeitraums ausgeht - Ob eine Umweltverschmutzung durch Smog oder Radioaktivität ist den Investoren so was von S... egal - das können die sich nicht mal selbst vorstellen wie egal das ist.
Ich bleibe dabei: Atomenergie ist nur sauber, wenn man nicht darüber spricht.
einen Geigerzähler sollte man sich schon zulegen, bzw. sich so ein Gerät mit Nachbarn od. Freunden teilen - ab und an sollte man doch mal die Möglichkeit haben etwas nach zu prüfen. Denn wir dürfen uns nicht mehr auf Zoll und Umweltamt verlassen - die in anderen Ländern praktisch nicht existent sind.
Wir erhalten so viel Ware aus Fernost - für mich nur eine Zeitfrage bis es ausschlägt.
Die Asen mit dem Zeugs rum - geht auf keine Kuhhaut mehr.
03.03.14 12:33
#46
später_Wurm
und diesen!!
Wer diesen Film gesehen hat vergisst es nicht. Sound auf Lautstärke bringen und cool bleiben - es ist vorbei!!
YouTube Video
YouTube Video
03.03.14 15:17
#48
Multiculti
Gestern im Fernsehen,da lebt
ein einziger Mann 12 Km nahe Fokushima in einer Kleinstadt,alle andern sind weg.Dieser kümmert sich um die noch lebenden Hunde und andere Tiere füttert sie u.umsorgt sie
Er selbst wird auch nicht mehr lange leben ein Arzt in Tokio der ihn untersuchte
sagte ,so einen verstrahlten Menschen habe er nie gesehen
Er selbst wird auch nicht mehr lange leben ein Arzt in Tokio der ihn untersuchte
sagte ,so einen verstrahlten Menschen habe er nie gesehen
27.04.14 09:57
#52
Jule34
Das ist ja eigentlich off topic,
aber wenn wir hier schon G. Öttinger zur Energiepolitik anhören sollen, dann passt es doch dazu :
Öttinger spricht Englisch ! YouTube Video
Öttinger spricht Englisch ! YouTube Video
27.04.14 21:37
#53
Jule34
Nicht nur Fukushima.
Eine Freundin, die letztes Jahr mit ihrer Tochter in ihre alte Heimat Kasachstan gefahren ist, erzählte von den vielen Menschen, die dort inzwischen an Krebs erkrankt sind.
Folgen oft vertuschter nuklearer Havarien in der ehemaligen UdSSR :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsGZeqPrECM
Folgen oft vertuschter nuklearer Havarien in der ehemaligen UdSSR :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsGZeqPrECM
28.04.14 01:50
#54
Jule34
Ergänzung
#53 : Englisch nach 1 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pwwb8rTZgI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pwwb8rTZgI
18.12.14 22:09
#55
RobinW
The Fukushima Endgame
The Fukushima Endgame: The Radioactive Contamination of the Pacific Ocean
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, December 17, 2014
Region: Asia
Theme: Environment
272 54 8 848
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-fukushima-endgame/5420188
radiation fukushima
Nuclear radiation resulting from the March 2011 Fukushima disaster –which threatens life on planet earth– is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities.
The shaky political consensus both in Japan, the U.S. and Western Europe is that the crisis at Fukushima has been contained.
The truth is otherwise. Known and documented, the ongoing dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination.
Tthis water contains plutonium 239 and its release into the Ocean has both local as well as global repercussions. A microgram of plutonium if inhaled, according to Dr. Helen Caldicott, can cause death:
Certain isotopes of radioactive plutonium are known as some of the deadliest poisons on the face of the earth. A mere microgram (a speck of darkness on a pinhead) of Plutonium-239, if inhaled, can cause death, and if ingested, radioactive Plutonium can be harmful, causing leukemia and other bone cancers.
“In the days following the 2011 earthquake and nuclear plant explosions, seawater meant to cool the nuclear power plants instead carried radioactive elements back to the Pacific ocean. Radioactive Plutonium was one of the elements streamed back to sea.” (decodescience.com).
It would appear that the radioactive water has already penetrated parts of the Japanese coastline:
Environmental testing of shoreline around the nuclear plant (as well fish, especially Tuna) showed negligible amounts of Plutonium in the seawater. The Plutonium, from what little is reported, sank into the sediments off the Japanese coast.” (Ibid)
A recent report suggests that the Japanese government is intent upon releasing the remaining radioactive water into the Ocean. The proposed “solution” becomes the cause of radioactive contamination of both the Japanese coastline as well as the Pacific Ocean, extending to the coastline of North America.
While the chairman of the Nuclear Radiation Authority recognizes that the water in the tanks is heavily “tainted”, a decision has nonetheless been taken to empty the tanks and dump the water into the Ocean:
The head of Japan’s nuclear watchdog said contaminated water stored at the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant should be released into the ocean to ensure safe decommissioning of the reactors.
Shunichi Tanaka, the chairman of the Nuclear Regulation Authority, made the comment Dec. 12 after visiting the facility to observe progress in dismantling the six reactors. The site was severely damaged in the tsunami generated by the 2011 earthquake.
“I was overwhelmed by the sheer number of tanks (holding water tainted with radioactive substances),” Tanaka told reporters, indicating they pose a danger to decommissioning work. “We have to dispose of the water.”
With regard to expected protests by local fishermen over the discharge, Tanaka said, “We also have to obtain the consent of local residents in carrying out the work, so we can somehow mitigate (the increase in tainted water).”
Tanaka has said previously that to proceed with decommissioning, tainted water stored on the site would need to be released into the sea so long as it had been decontaminated to accepted safety standards.
“While (the idea) may upset people, we must do our utmost to satisfy residents of Fukushima,” Tanaka said, adding that the NRA would provide information to local residents based on continuing studies of radioactive elements in local waters.
The inspection tour was Tanaka’s second since he became NRA chief in September 2012. He last visited in April 2013.
During his visit, Tanaka observed work at a trench on the ocean side of the No. 2 reactor building, where highly contaminated water is being pumped out. He also inspected barriers set up around the storage tanks to prevent leaks of tainted water.
Tanaka praised the completion in November of work to remove all spent nuclear fuel from the No. 4 reactor building, as well as changes to work procedures that he said allows for the completion of the work at the No. 2 reactor trench. Hiromi Kumai , NRA Head Signals Massive Release of Tainted Water to Help Decommission Fukushima Site Asahi Shimbun December 13, 2014
The contradictory statements of the NRA chief avoid addressing the broader implications, by giving the impression that the issue is local and that local fishermen off the Fukushima coast will be consulted.
Additional articles and videos on Fukushima and Nuclear Radiation are available at Global Research’s Dossier on The Environment
TEXT BOX
Nuclear Radiation: Categorization
At Fukushima, reports confirm that alpha, beta, gamma particles and neutrons have been released:
“While non-ionizing radiation and x-rays are a result of electron transitions in atoms or molecules, there are three forms of ionizing radiation that are a result of activity within the nucleus of an atom. These forms of nuclear radiation are alpha particles (α-particles), beta particles (β-particles) and gamma rays (γ-rays).
Alpha particles are heavy positively charged particles made up of two protons and two neutrons. They are essentially a helium nucleus and are thus represented in a nuclear equation by either α or . See the Alpha Decay page for more information on alpha particles.
Beta particles come in two forms: and . particles are just electrons that have been ejected from the nucleus. This is a result of sub-nuclear reactions that result in a neutron decaying to a proton. The electron is needed to conserve charge and comes from the nucleus. It is not an orbital electron. particles are positrons ejected from the nucleus when a proton decays to a neutron. A positron is an anti-particle that is similar in nearly all respects to an electron, but has a positive charge. See the Beta Decay page for more information on beta particles.
Gamma rays are photons of high energy electromagnetic radiation (light). Gamma rays generally have the highest frequency and shortest wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum. There is some overlap in the frequencies of gamma rays and x-rays; however, x-rays are formed from electron transitions while gamma rays are formed from nuclear transitions. See the Gamma Rays for more” (SOURCE: Canadian Nuclear Association)
“A neutron is a particle that is found in the nucleus, or center, of atoms. It has a mass very close to protons, which also reside in the nucleus of atoms. Together, they make up almost all of the mass of individual atoms. Each has a mass of about 1 amu, which is roughly 1.6×10-27kg. Protons have a positive charge and neutrons have no charge, which is why they were more difficult to discover.” (SOURCE: Neutron Radiation)
“Many different radioactive isotopes are used in or are produced by nuclear reactors. The most important of these are described below:
1. Uranium 235 (U-235) is the active component of most nuclear reactor fuel.
2. Plutonium (Pu-239) is a key nuclear material used in modern nuclear weapons and is also present as a by-product in certain reprocessed fuels used in some nuclear reactors. Pu-239 is also produced in uranium reactors as a byproduct of fission of U-235.
3. Cesium (Cs-137 ) is a fission product of U-235. It emits beta and gamma radiation and can cause radiation sickness and death if exposures are high enough. …
4. Iodine 131 (I-131), also a fission product of U-235, emits beta and gamma radiation. After inhalation or ingestion, it is absorbed by and concentrated in the thyroid gland, where its beta radiation damages nearby thyroid tissue (SOURCE: Amesh A. Adalja, MD, Eric S. Toner, MD, Anita Cicero, JD, Joseph Fitzgerald, MS, MPH, and Thomas V. Inglesby MD, Radiation at Fukushima: Basic Issues and Concepts, March 31, 2011)
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, December 17, 2014
Region: Asia
Theme: Environment
272 54 8 848
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-fukushima-endgame/5420188
radiation fukushima
Nuclear radiation resulting from the March 2011 Fukushima disaster –which threatens life on planet earth– is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities.
The shaky political consensus both in Japan, the U.S. and Western Europe is that the crisis at Fukushima has been contained.
The truth is otherwise. Known and documented, the ongoing dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination.
Tthis water contains plutonium 239 and its release into the Ocean has both local as well as global repercussions. A microgram of plutonium if inhaled, according to Dr. Helen Caldicott, can cause death:
Certain isotopes of radioactive plutonium are known as some of the deadliest poisons on the face of the earth. A mere microgram (a speck of darkness on a pinhead) of Plutonium-239, if inhaled, can cause death, and if ingested, radioactive Plutonium can be harmful, causing leukemia and other bone cancers.
“In the days following the 2011 earthquake and nuclear plant explosions, seawater meant to cool the nuclear power plants instead carried radioactive elements back to the Pacific ocean. Radioactive Plutonium was one of the elements streamed back to sea.” (decodescience.com).
It would appear that the radioactive water has already penetrated parts of the Japanese coastline:
Environmental testing of shoreline around the nuclear plant (as well fish, especially Tuna) showed negligible amounts of Plutonium in the seawater. The Plutonium, from what little is reported, sank into the sediments off the Japanese coast.” (Ibid)
A recent report suggests that the Japanese government is intent upon releasing the remaining radioactive water into the Ocean. The proposed “solution” becomes the cause of radioactive contamination of both the Japanese coastline as well as the Pacific Ocean, extending to the coastline of North America.
While the chairman of the Nuclear Radiation Authority recognizes that the water in the tanks is heavily “tainted”, a decision has nonetheless been taken to empty the tanks and dump the water into the Ocean:
The head of Japan’s nuclear watchdog said contaminated water stored at the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant should be released into the ocean to ensure safe decommissioning of the reactors.
Shunichi Tanaka, the chairman of the Nuclear Regulation Authority, made the comment Dec. 12 after visiting the facility to observe progress in dismantling the six reactors. The site was severely damaged in the tsunami generated by the 2011 earthquake.
“I was overwhelmed by the sheer number of tanks (holding water tainted with radioactive substances),” Tanaka told reporters, indicating they pose a danger to decommissioning work. “We have to dispose of the water.”
With regard to expected protests by local fishermen over the discharge, Tanaka said, “We also have to obtain the consent of local residents in carrying out the work, so we can somehow mitigate (the increase in tainted water).”
Tanaka has said previously that to proceed with decommissioning, tainted water stored on the site would need to be released into the sea so long as it had been decontaminated to accepted safety standards.
“While (the idea) may upset people, we must do our utmost to satisfy residents of Fukushima,” Tanaka said, adding that the NRA would provide information to local residents based on continuing studies of radioactive elements in local waters.
The inspection tour was Tanaka’s second since he became NRA chief in September 2012. He last visited in April 2013.
During his visit, Tanaka observed work at a trench on the ocean side of the No. 2 reactor building, where highly contaminated water is being pumped out. He also inspected barriers set up around the storage tanks to prevent leaks of tainted water.
Tanaka praised the completion in November of work to remove all spent nuclear fuel from the No. 4 reactor building, as well as changes to work procedures that he said allows for the completion of the work at the No. 2 reactor trench. Hiromi Kumai , NRA Head Signals Massive Release of Tainted Water to Help Decommission Fukushima Site Asahi Shimbun December 13, 2014
The contradictory statements of the NRA chief avoid addressing the broader implications, by giving the impression that the issue is local and that local fishermen off the Fukushima coast will be consulted.
Additional articles and videos on Fukushima and Nuclear Radiation are available at Global Research’s Dossier on The Environment
TEXT BOX
Nuclear Radiation: Categorization
At Fukushima, reports confirm that alpha, beta, gamma particles and neutrons have been released:
“While non-ionizing radiation and x-rays are a result of electron transitions in atoms or molecules, there are three forms of ionizing radiation that are a result of activity within the nucleus of an atom. These forms of nuclear radiation are alpha particles (α-particles), beta particles (β-particles) and gamma rays (γ-rays).
Alpha particles are heavy positively charged particles made up of two protons and two neutrons. They are essentially a helium nucleus and are thus represented in a nuclear equation by either α or . See the Alpha Decay page for more information on alpha particles.
Beta particles come in two forms: and . particles are just electrons that have been ejected from the nucleus. This is a result of sub-nuclear reactions that result in a neutron decaying to a proton. The electron is needed to conserve charge and comes from the nucleus. It is not an orbital electron. particles are positrons ejected from the nucleus when a proton decays to a neutron. A positron is an anti-particle that is similar in nearly all respects to an electron, but has a positive charge. See the Beta Decay page for more information on beta particles.
Gamma rays are photons of high energy electromagnetic radiation (light). Gamma rays generally have the highest frequency and shortest wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum. There is some overlap in the frequencies of gamma rays and x-rays; however, x-rays are formed from electron transitions while gamma rays are formed from nuclear transitions. See the Gamma Rays for more” (SOURCE: Canadian Nuclear Association)
“A neutron is a particle that is found in the nucleus, or center, of atoms. It has a mass very close to protons, which also reside in the nucleus of atoms. Together, they make up almost all of the mass of individual atoms. Each has a mass of about 1 amu, which is roughly 1.6×10-27kg. Protons have a positive charge and neutrons have no charge, which is why they were more difficult to discover.” (SOURCE: Neutron Radiation)
“Many different radioactive isotopes are used in or are produced by nuclear reactors. The most important of these are described below:
1. Uranium 235 (U-235) is the active component of most nuclear reactor fuel.
2. Plutonium (Pu-239) is a key nuclear material used in modern nuclear weapons and is also present as a by-product in certain reprocessed fuels used in some nuclear reactors. Pu-239 is also produced in uranium reactors as a byproduct of fission of U-235.
3. Cesium (Cs-137 ) is a fission product of U-235. It emits beta and gamma radiation and can cause radiation sickness and death if exposures are high enough. …
4. Iodine 131 (I-131), also a fission product of U-235, emits beta and gamma radiation. After inhalation or ingestion, it is absorbed by and concentrated in the thyroid gland, where its beta radiation damages nearby thyroid tissue (SOURCE: Amesh A. Adalja, MD, Eric S. Toner, MD, Anita Cicero, JD, Joseph Fitzgerald, MS, MPH, and Thomas V. Inglesby MD, Radiation at Fukushima: Basic Issues and Concepts, March 31, 2011)